2023-03-11 13:11:06 by ramamurthys
This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.
A Handbook of Classical Sanskrit Rhetoric
3G18
उदाहरणम् Ud
It is ud
illustration etc. Though this device is very common in language and
literature yet as a separate figure of speech it is recognised by
Jagann
and has the following features:
(a)
hand and its equivalent (ie prastuta and aprastuta),
(b)
(c) the prastuta and aprastuta or the contextual and the
non-contextual are mutually related by some sort of
similitude,
(d) in order to strengthen a general proposition a particu-
lar proposition is cited as illustration in support of the
lar proposition is cited as illustration in support of the
former. These two propositions are related by some
sort of similarity in meaning.
eg 1. abhimata-guno'pi padārtho do
nikhila-rasāyana-rajo gandhenogre
अभिमतगुणोऽपि पदार्थो दोषेणैकेन निन्दितो भवति ।
निखिलरसायनराजो गन्धेनोग्रेण लशुन इव ॥
A thing though agreeable by its merits
For only one defect gets censure,
Like the garlic, by smell most obnoxious,
Still the best of elixir.
34-44
<headword>उपन्यास</headword>
उपन्यासः Upanyāsaḥ :
upa nyāsa (√nyas a < ghañ) lilerally means placement, statement, sug
gestion, proposal, reference, hint etc. Rhetorically Upanyāsa is a figure
where something very different from the factual meaning or the
primary sense is conveyed. The figure is named Assignment since
the poet assigns here a non-contextual meaning through the plain
meaning expressed therein.
Digitized by Google
Original from
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN