This page has not been fully proofread.

Brazaio gatsza" i. e., "this atman is your
internal ruler; what is other than that (the Jiva) is
transient" and thus the Jiva and the Antaryam-
in are declared to be different. At the end of
Brahmana 8, on the other hand, when the
characterisation is finished, the conclusion is
as follows:- 'yaiwg dayè sih
 
66
 
a' "In
 
this akshara (Indestructible) âkasâ (ether) is
woven as warp and woof, and thus non-differ-
ence is declared between the two. Also, the
internal ruler (antaryamin) is differentiated by
name from the other which is called akshara.
Moreover the word "" "then" is used to
indicate the starting of a topic different from the
one treated of in the 7th Brahmana and there-
fore, they do not clearly "aim at describing one
and the same thing." The same thing looked
at from the same point of view cannot be charac-
terised as both possessing qualities and as devoid
of them. We have, also, already shown that the
Upanishadic literature distinguishes between the
non-differenced or the higher Brahman and
Isvara (Antaryamin) or the lower Brahman,-
take, for instance, the Mandukya- Upanishad.
 
G
 
Ixxxi
 
6
 
""