2023-04-29 06:01:39 by ramamurthys
This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.
230a
क्षोणीभ
इति च राघवपाण्डवीये (७-४१) ।
प्रसभमिवाङ्गदविह्वला महेला इति कविराजस्य प्रयोगश्च ।
गज इव परमहेलाविलासी इति [^230b]कविकल्पलतायाम् (
सलिकल्यनिमहि-इत्यादिसूत्रेण (
कथं महेलेति चेत्
मन्यामहे
धीना इति । महिलायां महेला च इति द्विरूपकोशश्च ।
अथ कथम्-
साहित्यकण्टकोद्धारः
जन्मेन किं सकलभोगनिदानभूतां
सन्मेनकासहचरीमपहाय बालाम् ।
यन्मे हरं हरिणलाञ्छनचन्द्रचूडं
यन्मेदुरं त्रिपुरसूदनमन्तरेण ॥
.231a
इति कविकल्पलतायाम् अक्बरीयकालिदासः[^231a] । सर्वत्र नान्तस्यैव जन्म-
[^230]. MSS. A, C & F read : P
ran
raṇe. In MSS. D & E the portion is missing. This is a reference to the
P
wrote also a commentary on the Prakriy
mentary is known as Prakriyāprakā
(p. 114; C.S.S.) refers to it thus: tad etat sakalam abhisandhāya prakriyāprakāśe
gurucara
[^230
is mahati ilä
is mahatī ilā, and the other is vanit
[^230
Sociey of Bengal, Calcutta. This was not available in full. First part had
the auto-commentary.
4th & 5th section in the third chapter reads the commentary as:
sü
sūryakavir
This S
177 also. The auto-commentary explains paramahelā-vilāsī thus: pare
mahelā=str
Upamitibhavaprapañcā of Siddhar
[^231]. See S.K. & T.B. on U
paramahela
paramahelārato'py ap
and attributes the line to one Damayant
same line to Sriharsa
same line to Śriharṣa(?). I am unable to verify.
[^231
kālidāsa are noted by Haradatta Sharma, in the I.H.Q., Vol. X. (p. 484
This is not found there. I did not have access to the last part of the
Kavikalpalat
Kavikalpalat
whether the author of the former was also known by that name or title.