2023-04-10 05:19:34 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
Introduction
xix
V. Some names of new works and authors cited in the
S.K.U.
Apart from the well-known works and poets,
our author mentions some new names, which are
not known as far as I can search - from other
sources.
I. He quotes a part of verse from one Bhrgu-
vamsa (p. 56).
2.
He quotes from one Rāmavijaya (p. 68).
3.
He refers to one Narasimhacampükavya (p. 46).
This was probably the one attributed to Suryakavi.
See S. K. De, H.S.P., p. 262. See also Note 177.
4. He quotes a verse from one Raghūttamakavya
(p. 61), which is attributed to his (elder) brother.
5. There is a reference to one Lavanyalahari
(p. 50).
6. He quotes the last foot of a verse (prabhus tu
etc. p. 54) which is found in full in the Tattvabodhini.
See Note 211. This verse is attributed by our author
to one Dhakkārāmakavi. The name of Dhakka-
rāmakavi is not found in the Tattvabodhini, or in other
sources available to me.
7. He refers to one Akbariya-Kālidāsa. But the
verse cited in the S.K.U. (p. 60) is not found among
the verses quoted by Haradatta Sharma in his article
(on p. 484) in the Indian Historical Quarterly (v. X;
1934, September). But there is also some confusion
because of the use of Kavikalpalatāyām here. See
Note 231-a.
xix
V. Some names of new works and authors cited in the
S.K.U.
Apart from the well-known works and poets,
our author mentions some new names, which are
not known as far as I can search - from other
sources.
I. He quotes a part of verse from one Bhrgu-
vamsa (p. 56).
2.
He quotes from one Rāmavijaya (p. 68).
3.
He refers to one Narasimhacampükavya (p. 46).
This was probably the one attributed to Suryakavi.
See S. K. De, H.S.P., p. 262. See also Note 177.
4. He quotes a verse from one Raghūttamakavya
(p. 61), which is attributed to his (elder) brother.
5. There is a reference to one Lavanyalahari
(p. 50).
6. He quotes the last foot of a verse (prabhus tu
etc. p. 54) which is found in full in the Tattvabodhini.
See Note 211. This verse is attributed by our author
to one Dhakkārāmakavi. The name of Dhakka-
rāmakavi is not found in the Tattvabodhini, or in other
sources available to me.
7. He refers to one Akbariya-Kālidāsa. But the
verse cited in the S.K.U. (p. 60) is not found among
the verses quoted by Haradatta Sharma in his article
(on p. 484) in the Indian Historical Quarterly (v. X;
1934, September). But there is also some confusion
because of the use of Kavikalpalatāyām here. See
Note 231-a.