सुभाषितनीवी /10

<page>
<p lang="sa">dhava) is said to have attended the court of Sarvajňu

Şingama Nayudu.
 
</p>
<p lang="sa">Thus we see that the renowned author of Rasarṇava-

sudhakara or Şingabhupaliya could not have been a con-

temporary of Sri-Vêdântâcharya, who lived only up to

1369 A.C. Professor Şeshagiri Sastriyar's identification
&apos;s identification
in question is therefore untenable.
 
</p>
<p lang="sa">It now remains to be seen who might be the Prince,

Singappu Nayak referred to in the tradition. For this

purpose it is necessary to examine the following pedigree

of Simba-Bhupala as detailed in the introductory chapter

of Rasárṇavasudhakara: ---
 
</p>
<p lang="sa">*This author is said to have written also a commentary on

Sarngadeva'&apos;s Sangitaratnakara. Professor Bhandarkar (in his

Early History of the Dekkan, 1895, p. 112) says that this commen-
tary
is "
tary
is &quot;attributed to a king of the name of Singa who is represen-

ted as a paramount sovereign of the Andhra circle," and adds that
"&quot; and adds that
&quot;this Singa appears in all likelihood to be Singhana"&quot; (the Yadava

king of Devagiri). I doubt very much the correctness of this sur-

mise. The colophon at the end of Rasárnavasudhikara reads thus:-
 
</p>
<p lang="sa">इति श्रीमदान्ध्रमही मण्डलाधीश्वर प्रतिगण्डभैरव श्रीयन पोतनरेन्द्रनन्दन

भुजबलभीम श्रीशिङ्गभूपालविरचिते रसार्णवसुधाकरनाम्नि नाट्यालङ्कार -

शास्त्रे -
 
</p>
</page>