2023-06-22 12:07:45 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
सिद्धान्तबिन्दु
something without form or colour and without
parts either?
३९. कात्रानुपपत्तिः ? विभ्रमहेतूनां विचित्रत्वात् । जपाकुसुमरूपस्य नीरू-
पस्यापि स्फटिकादौ प्रतिबिम्बदर्शनात, शब्दस्यापि प्रतिशब्दाख्य प्रतिबिम्बो-
पलम्भात्, तयोः सम्प्रतिपत्र प्रतिबिम्बवैलक्षणण्यानिरूपणात् ॥
21
39. Answer : What is unreasonable about it ? Because
the product of illusion can be variegated indeed. The
form and colour of the hybiscus-themselves without
form and colour 12 – are seen reflected in the crystal ;
even sound has a reflection called an echo. And they
are not different from the accepted reflection.
४०. तथाऽपीन्द्रियग्राह्यस्यैव प्रतिबिम्ब इति चेत् ।
40. Objection:- Even so the reflection is only of some-
thing that can be perceived through the senses.
४१. नं, व्यभिचारात् । अनिन्द्रियग्राह्यस्य साक्षिप्रत्यक्षस्य आकाशस्यापि
जलादो प्रतिबिम्बोपलम्भात् । अन्यथा जानुमात्रेऽप्युद के अतिगम्भीरताप्रती-
तिः स्यात् । आकाशप्रतिबिम्बस्य साक्षिभास्यत्वेऽपि अधिष्ठानग्रहणार्थं
चक्षुषोऽषेक्षणात् । एतेन नीलं नभः इत्यादि विभ्रमेऽपि चक्षुरन्वयव्यतिरेको
व्याख्याती, तत्र सालो कस्या काशस्याधिष्ठानत्वात् । तस्मात् चाक्षुषप्रतिबिम्ब-
मेव रूपसापेक्षम्, नान्यादित्यवंधेयम् ॥
41. Answer:- No, because it is not invariably so. It is
seen that space which is apprehended by the witness
and not perceived by the senses, is seen reflected in
water. Otherwise, the great depth of space could
not be perceived in water only knee deep. Though
the reflection of space (the sky) is apprehended by
12 Colour and form rūpa', is a quality: It can not be said
to possess another quality. A quality is said to be inherent in a
substance, and cannot, therefore be predicated of another
quality. So non-acceptance of one quality in another is a funda-
mental principle in nyāya'. ' Gune guna-anangikārah'. Thus
the 'rapa', the form and the colour, of the hybiscus flower
which is reflected in the crystal is itself without rupa.
"
"
something without form or colour and without
parts either?
३९. कात्रानुपपत्तिः ? विभ्रमहेतूनां विचित्रत्वात् । जपाकुसुमरूपस्य नीरू-
पस्यापि स्फटिकादौ प्रतिबिम्बदर्शनात, शब्दस्यापि प्रतिशब्दाख्य प्रतिबिम्बो-
पलम्भात्, तयोः सम्प्रतिपत्र प्रतिबिम्बवैलक्षणण्यानिरूपणात् ॥
21
39. Answer : What is unreasonable about it ? Because
the product of illusion can be variegated indeed. The
form and colour of the hybiscus-themselves without
form and colour 12 – are seen reflected in the crystal ;
even sound has a reflection called an echo. And they
are not different from the accepted reflection.
४०. तथाऽपीन्द्रियग्राह्यस्यैव प्रतिबिम्ब इति चेत् ।
40. Objection:- Even so the reflection is only of some-
thing that can be perceived through the senses.
४१. नं, व्यभिचारात् । अनिन्द्रियग्राह्यस्य साक्षिप्रत्यक्षस्य आकाशस्यापि
जलादो प्रतिबिम्बोपलम्भात् । अन्यथा जानुमात्रेऽप्युद के अतिगम्भीरताप्रती-
तिः स्यात् । आकाशप्रतिबिम्बस्य साक्षिभास्यत्वेऽपि अधिष्ठानग्रहणार्थं
चक्षुषोऽषेक्षणात् । एतेन नीलं नभः इत्यादि विभ्रमेऽपि चक्षुरन्वयव्यतिरेको
व्याख्याती, तत्र सालो कस्या काशस्याधिष्ठानत्वात् । तस्मात् चाक्षुषप्रतिबिम्ब-
मेव रूपसापेक्षम्, नान्यादित्यवंधेयम् ॥
41. Answer:- No, because it is not invariably so. It is
seen that space which is apprehended by the witness
and not perceived by the senses, is seen reflected in
water. Otherwise, the great depth of space could
not be perceived in water only knee deep. Though
the reflection of space (the sky) is apprehended by
12 Colour and form rūpa', is a quality: It can not be said
to possess another quality. A quality is said to be inherent in a
substance, and cannot, therefore be predicated of another
quality. So non-acceptance of one quality in another is a funda-
mental principle in nyāya'. ' Gune guna-anangikārah'. Thus
the 'rapa', the form and the colour, of the hybiscus flower
which is reflected in the crystal is itself without rupa.
"
"