2023-06-22 12:07:38 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
xxix
Alternative: Brahman Consciousness delimited by
the mind as locus of dream ignorance
Objection: The dream experience of an elephant
should be 'I am an elephant'
Answer: No, because of the absence of the locus
Conclusion of discussion of dream; taijasa
Deep-sleep, sushupti, experiences through the
functioning of ignorance, avidyā-vṛtti
Distinction from total dissolution, pralaya
Ego experienced only in the waking state; transfer
of the witness-experience of sleep to the ego of
waking
Superimposition of Brahman on name etc. an act of
the will, reasoning also is such, neither right
congnition nor illusion
Process of reasoning-four or five types of
anvaya-vyatireka
Experience of bliss in deep sleep
Non-different from God, Iswara
States of the mind in waking, cause of distinction
among cognisers, the witness limited as congniser,
witness common to all bodies
Objection-Memory of painful sleep
Answer-painfulness is only the memory of conditions
preceding sleep
Alternative explanation therefor; division of each
of the three states
Adhāytmika, adhidaivika and adhibhautika division of the
three states of consciousness
Meditation as Hiraṇyagarbha, gradual release;
becoming pure Consciousness immediate release
The three states as products of ignorance
All distinctions reasonable within the phenomenal,
no distinction at all in Reality.
Introducing verse ix; Verse ix
The witness only immortal; all else mortal
Objection that the self being pure consciousness is not
joyful; answered
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184-186
187-188
Alternative: Brahman Consciousness delimited by
the mind as locus of dream ignorance
Objection: The dream experience of an elephant
should be 'I am an elephant'
Answer: No, because of the absence of the locus
Conclusion of discussion of dream; taijasa
Deep-sleep, sushupti, experiences through the
functioning of ignorance, avidyā-vṛtti
Distinction from total dissolution, pralaya
Ego experienced only in the waking state; transfer
of the witness-experience of sleep to the ego of
waking
Superimposition of Brahman on name etc. an act of
the will, reasoning also is such, neither right
congnition nor illusion
Process of reasoning-four or five types of
anvaya-vyatireka
Experience of bliss in deep sleep
Non-different from God, Iswara
States of the mind in waking, cause of distinction
among cognisers, the witness limited as congniser,
witness common to all bodies
Objection-Memory of painful sleep
Answer-painfulness is only the memory of conditions
preceding sleep
Alternative explanation therefor; division of each
of the three states
Adhāytmika, adhidaivika and adhibhautika division of the
three states of consciousness
Meditation as Hiraṇyagarbha, gradual release;
becoming pure Consciousness immediate release
The three states as products of ignorance
All distinctions reasonable within the phenomenal,
no distinction at all in Reality.
Introducing verse ix; Verse ix
The witness only immortal; all else mortal
Objection that the self being pure consciousness is not
joyful; answered
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184-186
187-188