2023-06-22 12:07:37 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
xxvi
The one-soul view ; ekajīvavāda
Objection regarding contradictory views and answer
to them
Objection regarding distinction of prameya and
pramāṇa
Answer: The determination of object and means of
knowing the two powers of avidyā
Further elaboration of the distinction
The function of the mind in producing congnition
Objection that certain categories should be constantly
congnized without a function of the mind
Answer
Objection: How can the Infinite be covered ?
Answer: Conceived as covered because of the soul's
limitation
Objection: The breaking of the veil in ordinary
knowing should cause avaraṇa-bhanga
Answer: The analogy of fire and the cooling gem
Objection: Ignorance irremovable
Answer: Ignorance removed and by the knowledge
arising from the mahävākyas
(:
Alternative explanation based in a primal ignorance
and innumerable secondary ignorances
Objection: Is ignorance removed by inference?
Answer: Two kinds of covering, avarana :
Conclusion of this section
Objection based on anirvacanīya-khyāti, the 1:
indeterminate theory of erroneous perception
Answer to this
Conclusion of verse 1.
Perlude to verse 2-Objection If Scripture becomes
invalid Brahmajňāna arising from it would also
be invalid.
Reply to the above and verse 2
Some of words explained
Introduction to verse 3, and verse 3
Explanation of some of the words
73
74-80
81
82-83
84
: 85
86
87
88
. 89
90
91.
92
93
94
95
96
97.
98.
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
The one-soul view ; ekajīvavāda
Objection regarding contradictory views and answer
to them
Objection regarding distinction of prameya and
pramāṇa
Answer: The determination of object and means of
knowing the two powers of avidyā
Further elaboration of the distinction
The function of the mind in producing congnition
Objection that certain categories should be constantly
congnized without a function of the mind
Answer
Objection: How can the Infinite be covered ?
Answer: Conceived as covered because of the soul's
limitation
Objection: The breaking of the veil in ordinary
knowing should cause avaraṇa-bhanga
Answer: The analogy of fire and the cooling gem
Objection: Ignorance irremovable
Answer: Ignorance removed and by the knowledge
arising from the mahävākyas
(:
Alternative explanation based in a primal ignorance
and innumerable secondary ignorances
Objection: Is ignorance removed by inference?
Answer: Two kinds of covering, avarana :
Conclusion of this section
Objection based on anirvacanīya-khyāti, the 1:
indeterminate theory of erroneous perception
Answer to this
Conclusion of verse 1.
Perlude to verse 2-Objection If Scripture becomes
invalid Brahmajňāna arising from it would also
be invalid.
Reply to the above and verse 2
Some of words explained
Introduction to verse 3, and verse 3
Explanation of some of the words
73
74-80
81
82-83
84
: 85
86
87
88
. 89
90
91.
92
93
94
95
96
97.
98.
99
100
101
102
103
104
105