2023-06-22 12:07:37 by ambuda-bot

This page has not been fully proofread.

XXV
 
Objection to the reflection of a formless entity and
 
answer to it
 
Objection: Regarding absence of evidence for the
reflection of the self
 
Answer: Evidence of reflection in the sruti
 
Reflection theory: Pratibimba-vāda and appearance
theory: Abhasa-vāda
 
Objection to the idea of Super-imposition, adhyasa
Answer: General
 
Sruties supporting superimposition, adhyāsa
 
Reasoning supporting adhyasa
 
Objection to accepting the temporary adjuncts,
 
Upādhis to knowledge
 
Answer by a counter-objection
 
Further answer regarding the necessity for accepting
 
adhyāsa
 
Ignorance, avidyā is positive in nature
 
Not a series of mistaken knowings
 
Also the cause of mistake; and conclusion regarding
 
superimposition and its continuation
 
Progressive extenstion of superimposition
Conclusion of the discussion on superimposition
The posibility of sünya-vāda refuted-superimposition
is without beginning, anādi
 
Objection to Şankara's description of superimposition
Answer and final definition
 
Abhāsavāda: The appearance view
Vivaraṇakārās view
 
38-41
 
Sankshepa-Sariraka's view
 
Avaccheda-vada, the delimitation view
 
2
 
42 43
 
44
45-48
 
49
 
50
 
51
 
52
 
53
 
54-55
 
56
 
57
 
Explanation of all perceived and conventionally accep-
ted distinctions-The Lord and the soul, Iswara and
jiva, Vārtika view
 
Iswara and Jiva; Sankshepa-sariraka view
 
Objection regarding freedom and bondage pertaining
to different entities, being vyadhikarana
 
Answer: No inconsistency
 
58
 
59-60
 
61
 
62
 
63
 
64
 
65
 
66
 
66
 
67
 
68
 
69
 
70-71
 
72