2023-06-22 12:07:37 by ambuda-bot

This page has not been fully proofread.

ANALYSIS OF THE TEXT AND TRANSLATION
 
Author's introduction
 
Objection: No need for Atmajñāna
 
Reply: It is necessary and useful
 
The mahāvākyas, the great statements, the means of
 
knowing Atman-Brahman
 
Meanings of words and statements
 
Objection: Regarding the necessity for discussion
Reply: Discussion to dispel doubts caused by the
disputants
 
Priority of the tvam-pada-artha, the meaning of the
word 'Thou' :
 
View of the Carvāka, the Vijnanavādin, the
 
Madhyamika, 'Jaina, Vaişeshika, Nyaya,
 
Prabhākara, Bhatta, Sankhya, Yoga and the
Upanishads the vedanta
 
Conclusion of the author's introduction as a
 
prelude to verse 1.
 
Verse 1 and its translation
 
Refutation of other views :
 
The grounds of refutation
 
The reason elaborated
 
1
 
Objection: The self absent in 'sushupti', deep sleep
Answer: Awareness present as the witness in deep
sleep
 
Proved by the memory of that condition
 
Objection: No need for a witness
 
Paragraph
 
1
 
2
 
3
 
4.
 
5-7
 
8
 
10
 
11
 
12
 
13
 
15-20
 
21
 
22-27
 
28
 
29
 
29
 
30
 
Answer: Need proved
 
31
 
32
 
Objection: No evidence for the unchanging witness
Reply: Scriptural evidence for the unchanging witness 33
Objections to the rejection of the mind as the knower
 
and answers thereto
 
34-37
 
I
 
1
 
1