siddhantabindu /102
This page has not been fully proofread.
64
सिद्धान्तबिन्दु
१२३. एवं पाशुपतमतं पाञ्जरात्रिकं जैनं च मतं श्रुतियुक्तिबाधितत्वादयुक्तम् ।
123. Likewise, the views of the Saivas, the pāncha-
ratras and the jainas are all contradicted by the scrip-
tures and reason and are therefore untenable.
१२४. न च विधिशेषत्वाच्छुतिर्न ब्रह्म प्रतिपादयतीति मीमांसकमतं युक्तम्,
असिद्धत्वाद्विधिशेषत्वस्य न चार्थवादाधिकरणन्यायाद्विधिशेषत्वम्, वैषम्यात ।
124. The view of the māmāmsakas that all statements
are part of injunctions and therefore, the scriptures do
not teach about the Infinite is also not valid. Because
it has not been established that all statements are
parts of injunctions. It cannot be claimed that the
subordination to injuctions is proved by the reasons
given in the topic of 'statements in praise'; because
there is a difference.
१२५. स्वतःप्रयोजनवदर्थाप्रतिपादकानां 'वायुर्वे क्षेपिष्ठा देवता' इत्येवमा-
दीनां स्वाध्यायविधिग्रहणान्यथानुपपत्त्या प्रयोजनवदर्थपरत्वे कल्पानीये
शब्दभावनेतिकर्तव्यतांशसाकाङ्क्षस्य विधेः सम्प्रदानभूतदे वतादिस्तुतिद्वारेण
तदंशपूरकत्वात् नष्ठाश्वदग्धरथन्यायेन तदुभयेकवाक्यतेत्यर्थवादाधिकरणे
निर्णीतम् ।
125. Statement like, " Vayu is the fastest God", (T.s.
ii, I, I) which do not expound a meaning that is useful
by itself, cannot be understood reasonably without
reference to the injuction regarding the study of the
scriptures. When it (the statement regarding the
speed of Vayu) has to be construed as having a
purposeful meaning, the question remains regarding
why it is to be done with reference to injunction. This
is satisfied by the praise of the God who is to receive
the sacrifice. Therefore, on the analogy of the lost
horses and the burnt chariot36, the two statements are
30 If, in the course of a battle, the horses of one chariot are
(
;
सिद्धान्तबिन्दु
१२३. एवं पाशुपतमतं पाञ्जरात्रिकं जैनं च मतं श्रुतियुक्तिबाधितत्वादयुक्तम् ।
123. Likewise, the views of the Saivas, the pāncha-
ratras and the jainas are all contradicted by the scrip-
tures and reason and are therefore untenable.
१२४. न च विधिशेषत्वाच्छुतिर्न ब्रह्म प्रतिपादयतीति मीमांसकमतं युक्तम्,
असिद्धत्वाद्विधिशेषत्वस्य न चार्थवादाधिकरणन्यायाद्विधिशेषत्वम्, वैषम्यात ।
124. The view of the māmāmsakas that all statements
are part of injunctions and therefore, the scriptures do
not teach about the Infinite is also not valid. Because
it has not been established that all statements are
parts of injunctions. It cannot be claimed that the
subordination to injuctions is proved by the reasons
given in the topic of 'statements in praise'; because
there is a difference.
१२५. स्वतःप्रयोजनवदर्थाप्रतिपादकानां 'वायुर्वे क्षेपिष्ठा देवता' इत्येवमा-
दीनां स्वाध्यायविधिग्रहणान्यथानुपपत्त्या प्रयोजनवदर्थपरत्वे कल्पानीये
शब्दभावनेतिकर्तव्यतांशसाकाङ्क्षस्य विधेः सम्प्रदानभूतदे वतादिस्तुतिद्वारेण
तदंशपूरकत्वात् नष्ठाश्वदग्धरथन्यायेन तदुभयेकवाक्यतेत्यर्थवादाधिकरणे
निर्णीतम् ।
125. Statement like, " Vayu is the fastest God", (T.s.
ii, I, I) which do not expound a meaning that is useful
by itself, cannot be understood reasonably without
reference to the injuction regarding the study of the
scriptures. When it (the statement regarding the
speed of Vayu) has to be construed as having a
purposeful meaning, the question remains regarding
why it is to be done with reference to injunction. This
is satisfied by the praise of the God who is to receive
the sacrifice. Therefore, on the analogy of the lost
horses and the burnt chariot36, the two statements are
30 If, in the course of a battle, the horses of one chariot are
(
;