2026-01-24 15:20:10 by akprasad
This page does not need to be proofread.
<page>
<p lang="sa">11
</p>
<p lang="sa">coherence, on their own cannot be followed even by
scholars well versed in the various śāstras. But the
lucid interpretation of Sri Madhwa''s works, given by
Sri Jayatirtha and also the formidable arguments that
were advanced by him in support of Sri Madhwa's
's
views, convinced the scholarly world of the inner strength
of the system.
</p>
<p lang="sa">After a century, the situation in the philosophical
world had completely changed. Gangeshopādhyāya, The
founder of the Navya Nyāya system had introduced
a new technique as an aid for discussing the philosophical
problems. His magnum opus Tattvachintāmaṇi had cast
an influence on all the philosophical systems including
an influence on all the philosophical systems including
the vedanta system. All the schools of philosophy started
to make use of the Navya Nyāya technique to substantiate
their respective views. Along with the Navya Nyāya
technique the Pūrva mīmāmsa rules of interpretation
also were profusely made use of by the Vedanta systems
to determine the tenability of a philosophical stand.
A supporter of a particular system had to take into
account all these points and was supposed to give
account all these points and was supposed to give
a fitting reply to the criticism making use of the mentioned
methodology. The Dvaita Vedanta system was challenged
by the arguments garbed with the new technique and
thinking. It was in this grim situation that Śrī Vyāsa
Tīrtha had entered the arena.
</p>
<p lang="sa">Śrī Vyāsa Tīrtha made use of the technique and
methodology that were prevalent in those days to the
methodology that were prevalent in those days to the
maximum extent possible. His arguments were based
on the points and evidences that were already stated
on the points and evidences that were already stated
by Śrī Madhwa and Sri Jayatīrtha, were put forward
with a new vigour and teancity as they were further
with a new vigour and teancity as they were further
strengthened with the Navya Nyāya techniques and
</p>
</page>
<p lang="sa">11
<p lang="sa">coherence, on their own cannot be followed even by
scholars well versed in the various śāstras. But the
lucid interpretation of Sri Madhwa
Sri Jayatirtha and also the formidable arguments that
were advanced by him in support of Sri Madhwa
views, convinced the scholarly world of the inner strength
of the system.
<p lang="sa">After a century, the situation in the philosophical
world had completely changed. Gangeshopādhyāya, The
founder of the Navya Nyāya system had introduced
a new technique as an aid for discussing the philosophical
problems. His magnum opus Tattvachintāmaṇi had cast
an influence on all the philosophical systems including
an influence on all the philosophical systems including
the vedanta system. All the schools of philosophy started
to make use of the Navya Nyāya technique to substantiate
their respective views. Along with the Navya Nyāya
technique the Pūrva mīmāmsa rules of interpretation
also were profusely made use of by the Vedanta systems
to determine the tenability of a philosophical stand.
A supporter of a particular system had to take into
account all these points and was supposed to give
account all these points and was supposed to give
a fitting reply to the criticism making use of the mentioned
methodology. The Dvaita Vedanta system was challenged
by the arguments garbed with the new technique and
thinking. It was in this grim situation that Śrī Vyāsa
Tīrtha had entered the arena.
<p lang="sa">Śrī Vyāsa Tīrtha made use of the technique and
methodology that were prevalent in those days to the
methodology that were prevalent in those days to the
maximum extent possible. His arguments were based
on the points and evidences that were already stated
on the points and evidences that were already stated
by Śrī Madhwa and Sri Jayatīrtha, were put forward
with a new vigour and teancity as they were further
with a new vigour and teancity as they were further
strengthened with the Navya Nyāya techniques and
</page>