2023-03-26 16:29:02 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
xxvii
5. Vedāntavādāvali.
6. Manidarpanam.
7. Samayasarvasvam.
8. Vidhinirnayam.
Tattvaparisuddhi.
9.
10. [Smrti] Ratnapradipa.
11. Bhavanapuruṣottamam.
12. S'itikanthajayam.
13. Sahityasanjivani.
14. Bhavodbhedam.
15. Rasārņavam.
16. Other miscellaneous works dealing with Pro-
sody, Astrology, Mantra, Tantra, some Dravidian Com-
positions, etc.
Of these the following only are accessible at present:
Vedantavadával. This work has recently been recover-
ed by the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library.
It has been described thus :
"A polemical treatise supporting the conclusions of
Advaita Vedānta and refuting the views of Visiṣṭādvaita
and Dvaita Schools of philosophy, by Srinivasayajvan,"¹
One of the opening verses runs thus:
षड्भाषासार्वभौमस्य श्रीनिवासस्य यज्वनः ।
वादावलिरियं विद्वत्कर्णभूषायतां चिरम् ॥
There is therefore no doubt that the author is the
same as the father of Rajacuḍāmani Dikṣita. And the
work under reference is probably the same as the Vādā-
vali mentioned by Balayajñavedesvara.
1
¹ Vol. IV, Part I-C., P. 5712-5713.
5. Vedāntavādāvali.
6. Manidarpanam.
7. Samayasarvasvam.
8. Vidhinirnayam.
Tattvaparisuddhi.
9.
10. [Smrti] Ratnapradipa.
11. Bhavanapuruṣottamam.
12. S'itikanthajayam.
13. Sahityasanjivani.
14. Bhavodbhedam.
15. Rasārņavam.
16. Other miscellaneous works dealing with Pro-
sody, Astrology, Mantra, Tantra, some Dravidian Com-
positions, etc.
Of these the following only are accessible at present:
Vedantavadával. This work has recently been recover-
ed by the Government Oriental Manuscripts Library.
It has been described thus :
"A polemical treatise supporting the conclusions of
Advaita Vedānta and refuting the views of Visiṣṭādvaita
and Dvaita Schools of philosophy, by Srinivasayajvan,"¹
One of the opening verses runs thus:
षड्भाषासार्वभौमस्य श्रीनिवासस्य यज्वनः ।
वादावलिरियं विद्वत्कर्णभूषायतां चिरम् ॥
There is therefore no doubt that the author is the
same as the father of Rajacuḍāmani Dikṣita. And the
work under reference is probably the same as the Vādā-
vali mentioned by Balayajñavedesvara.
1
¹ Vol. IV, Part I-C., P. 5712-5713.