मधुराविजयम् /95
This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.
In my commentary, I clarified here and there, to what others.
those descriptions bear resemblances as detailed below.
Of the King
This to some extent resembles the descriptions of Dileepa in
Raghu Kavya, and of Rama in Ramayana as well as of Sudraka.
in Kadambari. The dexterity in imagination is highly enlivening.
Of the City
The description of Vijayanagar followed in the wake of that.
of the king. Except in Ramayana and in the works of Bhatti, in
Sanskrit literature, this description was always separately dealt with.
Some kavyas ended with the descriptions of either the city or the
king. Very rarely rather incidentally, there are a few that took:
up this description of the capital. Dileepa described the Raghu
dynasty but we find nothing about Ayodhya. In 'Kumara
Sambhava', the Himalayas were described even at the beginning.
Only incidentally his capital Oshadhiprasthamu was described a
little in 6th canto. In 'Sisupalavadha ', Lord Srikrishna was
described. Dwaraka was described a little only in the 3rd canto.
Naishadham started with the description of Nala. In the descrip-
tion in Naishadha, his capital is not at all to be found. Telugu
Kavyas observed the tradition of describing both the king and his.
capital even at the beginning of the work. The same was adopted.
here also. Essentially this epic resembles, 'Kadambari', and
'Sisupalavadha' in wealth of imagination and in Metaphoric.
descriptions.
'Dauhrudavarnana'
(Description of morning sickness)
The description of the morning sickness of Devayee and of the
birth and childhood of Kamparaja stand on analogy with the
those descriptions bear resemblances as detailed below.
Of the King
This to some extent resembles the descriptions of Dileepa in
Raghu Kavya, and of Rama in Ramayana as well as of Sudraka.
in Kadambari. The dexterity in imagination is highly enlivening.
Of the City
The description of Vijayanagar followed in the wake of that.
of the king. Except in Ramayana and in the works of Bhatti, in
Sanskrit literature, this description was always separately dealt with.
Some kavyas ended with the descriptions of either the city or the
king. Very rarely rather incidentally, there are a few that took:
up this description of the capital. Dileepa described the Raghu
dynasty but we find nothing about Ayodhya. In 'Kumara
Sambhava', the Himalayas were described even at the beginning.
Only incidentally his capital Oshadhiprasthamu was described a
little in 6th canto. In 'Sisupalavadha ', Lord Srikrishna was
described. Dwaraka was described a little only in the 3rd canto.
Naishadham started with the description of Nala. In the descrip-
tion in Naishadha, his capital is not at all to be found. Telugu
Kavyas observed the tradition of describing both the king and his.
capital even at the beginning of the work. The same was adopted.
here also. Essentially this epic resembles, 'Kadambari', and
'Sisupalavadha' in wealth of imagination and in Metaphoric.
descriptions.
'Dauhrudavarnana'
(Description of morning sickness)
The description of the morning sickness of Devayee and of the
birth and childhood of Kamparaja stand on analogy with the