This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.

point of Panini's grammar are not defendable. And many words
are which need explaining and are so need. The correct gram-
matical process explained for their formation into such intricacies
the present commentator entered with many a word and came out
successfully.
 
Another difficulty is there with science of the figures of speech.
At certain places it is not easy to say that this is this figure. The
later rhetoricians of Sanskrit poetry had devoted big chapters for
this discussion. Some times the reader mistakes a superficial one
for the inherent one. At such places this commentator took many
pains to fix the correct figure of speech. He discusses large and
finally defences his position.
 
He does't deal only with the meaning the grammatical form
and the figure of speech. He lays bare the great scholarship of
the authoress Gangadevi. She seems to be a great scholar well
versed in all sastras and conversant with many arts and sciences
and military craft and state craft to Government. The commen-
tator has successfully unveiled the many things that are hidden
in the original.
 
In the modern times this is a rare attempt. Nobody dares
to approach this citadel of the <error>anicients</error><fix>ancients</fix>. This commentator knows
his capacity approached it and found an honourable entrance.
 
This Madhura Vijaya has gained more importance now-a-days
as it throws so much light on the history of the times. It must be
said that the present commentator has done double service both
to literature and history. May his book be well received
in quarters, which deserve to be introduced into.