This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.

303. <headword>जामातृशुद्धिन्यायः</headword>
 
पण्डितोपदिष्टं सर्वथा मौनमेवालम्बमानो (महिषीपाल:)
राजकन्यकया तद्वैदग्ध्यजिज्ञासया नवलिखितपुस्तकस्य।
शोधनाय उपरुद्धः। ... प्रसिद्धिभूत्॥
--प्रबन्धचिन्तामणि
 
The maxim refers to the act of trying to give a book
for reading to the son-in-law which is tantamount to
ask an ignorant dull man to do some intellectual work.
 
304. जामात्रर्थं प्रस्तुतस्य <headword>सूपादेरतिप्युपकारकत्वमितिन्यायः</headword>
 
The maxim suggests that even if the food is prepared
mainly for the son-in-law, it can be served for the other
guests also.
 
Some arguments are advanced in the Brahmasūtra to
refute the doctrine of the Sāṁkhyas that the cause of
the world is Pradhāna. According to this maxim, the
arguments can be utilized for refuting the same
Pradhāna doctrine of the Yogic theorists.
 
305. <headword>जालमत्स्यन्यायः</headword>
 
This maxim tells that a fish caught in a net can see
things outside but it cannot corne out from the net.
Similarly, a person caught in the snare of worldly
passions or delusions may understand the evil effects
of his position but cannot come out of it.
 
306. <headword>ट्रिटिट्टिभन्यायः</headword>
 
This maxim refers to an anecdote. The ocean used to
destroy the eggs of a female osprey. The male bird
lodged a complaint with Garuḍa who reported the
matter to Viṣṇu. At the behest of Viṣṇu, Garuda began
to dry up the ocean by flapping his huge wings.