This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.

Laukikanyayakośa
 
303 . <headword>जामातृशुद्धिन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
पण्डितोपदिष्टं सर्वथा मौनमेवालम्बमानो ( महिषीपाल: )

राजकन्यकया तद्वैदग्ध्यजिज्ञासया नवलिखितपुस्तकस्य

शोधनाय उपरुद्धः ... प्रसिद्धिभूत्
 

-
-प्रबन्धचिन्तामणि
 

 
The maxim refers to the act of trying to give a book

for reading to the son-in-law which is tantamount to

ask an ignorant dull man to do some intellectual work.
 

 
304. जामात्रर्थं प्रस्तुतस्य <headword>सूपादेरतिप्युपकारकत्वमितिन्यायः
 
81
 
</headword>
 
The maxim suggests that even if the food is prepared

mainly for the son-in-law, it can be served for the other
guests also.
 

guests also.
 
Some arguments are advanced in the Brahmasūtra to

refute the doctrine of the Samāṁkhyas that the cause of

the world is Pradhāna. According to this maxim, the

arguments can be utilized for refuting the same

Pradhāna doctrine of the Yogic theorists.
 

 
305. <headword>जालमत्स्यन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
This maxim tells that a fish caught in a net can see

things outside but it cannot corne out from the net.

Similarly, a person caught in the snare of worldly

passions or delusions may understand the evil effects

of his position but cannot come out of it.
 

 
306. टि<headword>ट्रिट्टिभन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
This maxim refers to an anecdote. The ocean used to

destroy the eggs of a female osprey. The male bird

lodged a complaint with Garuḍa who reported the
in

m
atter to Viṣņu. At the behest of Vișņṣṇu, Garuda began

to dry up the ocean by flapping his huge wings.