2023-02-17 10:21:20 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
Laukikanyayakośa
to abuse the dog uttering his brother-in-law's name.
His wife used to become sorrowful, thinking that her
husband was abusing her brother only. Really, God is
one but a sense of differentiation is deliberately created
by giving various names to the same God. Vișņu or
Śiva are eulogized with some ulterior motive only.
- सा० 136
688. श्येनकपोतन्यायः
187
Once a pigeon was just coming out of its nest when a
falcon attacked it and killed it. The maxim is employed
to describe such unexpected, accidental, dangerous
situations.
689. श्येनाधिकरणन्यायः
Cf. देवताधिकरणन्यायः, पाष्ठतिर्थगधिकरणन्यायः
Some Vedic injunctions prescribe the deity worship
(upāsana). This can be effected even by the superim-
posed godhood and the injunction of worship can be
valid. But this is not correct. Inspite of the worship-
oriented injunction, the suggested meaning can be valid,
in accordance with the Devatādhikaraṇanyāya.
The Syenādhikarṇanyāya also conveys the same idea.
- सा० 847
690. श्वपुच्छन्यायः
One may try to straighten the tail of a dog but he is
never successful. The maxim suggests that the natural
shape of a thing can never be changed.
691. श्वशुष्कास्थिन्यायः
A dog goes on chewing a dry bone. It does not stop
doing so, even if the blood starts flowing from the
to abuse the dog uttering his brother-in-law's name.
His wife used to become sorrowful, thinking that her
husband was abusing her brother only. Really, God is
one but a sense of differentiation is deliberately created
by giving various names to the same God. Vișņu or
Śiva are eulogized with some ulterior motive only.
- सा० 136
688. श्येनकपोतन्यायः
187
Once a pigeon was just coming out of its nest when a
falcon attacked it and killed it. The maxim is employed
to describe such unexpected, accidental, dangerous
situations.
689. श्येनाधिकरणन्यायः
Cf. देवताधिकरणन्यायः, पाष्ठतिर्थगधिकरणन्यायः
Some Vedic injunctions prescribe the deity worship
(upāsana). This can be effected even by the superim-
posed godhood and the injunction of worship can be
valid. But this is not correct. Inspite of the worship-
oriented injunction, the suggested meaning can be valid,
in accordance with the Devatādhikaraṇanyāya.
The Syenādhikarṇanyāya also conveys the same idea.
- सा० 847
690. श्वपुच्छन्यायः
One may try to straighten the tail of a dog but he is
never successful. The maxim suggests that the natural
shape of a thing can never be changed.
691. श्वशुष्कास्थिन्यायः
A dog goes on chewing a dry bone. It does not stop
doing so, even if the blood starts flowing from the