Laukika-nyāya-kośa /198

Lauto abuse the dog uttering his brother-in-law's name.
His wife used to become sorrowful, thinkikanyayakośa
 
to abuse the dog uttering his brotherng that her
husband was abusing her brother only. Really, God is
one but a sense of differentiation is deliberately created
by giving various names to the same God. Viṣṇu or
Śiva are eulogized with some ulterior motive only.
-in-law's name.
His wife used to become sorrowful, thinking that her
husband was abusing her brother only. Really, God is
one but a sense of differentiation is deliberately created
by giving various names to the same God. Vișņu or
Śiva are eulogized with some ulterior motive only.
 
- सा० 136
 

 
688. <headword>श्येनकपोतन्यायः
 
187
 
</headword>
 
Once a pigeon was just coming out of its nest when a

falcon attacked it and killed it. The maxim is employed

to describe such unexpected, accidental, dangerous
 
situations.
 

situations.
 
689. <headword>श्येनाधिकरणन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
Cf. देवताधिकरणन्यायः, पाष्ठतिर्थगधिकरणन्यायः
 

 
Some Vedic injunctions prescribe the deity worship

(upāsana). This can be effected even by the superim-

posed godhood and the injunction of worship can be

valid. But this is not correct. Inspite of the worship-

oriented injunction, the suggested meaning can be valid,

in accordance with the Devatādhikaraṇanyāya.

The SŚyenādhikarṇanyāya also conveys the same idea.
 

- -सा० 847
 

 
690. <headword>श्वपुच्छन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
One may try to straighten the tail of a dog but he is

never successful. The maxim suggests that the natural

shape of a thing can never be changed.
 

 
691. <headword>श्वशुष्कास्थिन्यायः
 
</headword>
 
A dog goes on chewing a dry bone. It does not stop

doing so, even if the blood starts flowing from the