हंससंदेशः /12
This page does not need to be proofread.
<page>
<p lang="sa">10
</p>
<p lang="sa">reverential disciple from memory; (5) a large number of
works on controversial religious subjects, of which
</p>
<p lang="sa">is most often studied; (6) a large number of works eluci-
dating and defining the tenets of Visishtadvaita; (7) a very
large number of stotras on the various aspects of the
Infinite, as well as upon the Gods and Goddesses of the:
temples he worshipped in; and (8) miscellaneous works
in Sanskrit and Tamil.
</p>
<p lang="sa">His genius was much more philosophic and religious.
than literary or scientific; for example, his ideas of the
Geography of the Earth must be treated as legendary or
explained away esoterically; but his logic in religious and
philosophic discussion has been found to be terribly
embarrassing to his antagonists. His mastery of the
Sanskrit language and the fluency of his diction have
justified the epithet of faar which he sometimes uses
to describe himself. On the whole he was one of the
most outstanding figures of his age in Southern India,
worshipped as an incarnation by his intimate admirers and
disciples, revered for his purity, honoured for his vast
learning, and whole-heartedly hated by the vested
religious interests he overthrew.
</p>
</page>
<p lang="sa">10
<p lang="sa">reverential disciple from memory; (5) a large number of
works on controversial religious subjects, of which
<p lang="sa">is most often studied; (6) a large number of works eluci-
dating and defining the tenets of Visishtadvaita; (7) a very
large number of stotras on the various aspects of the
Infinite, as well as upon the Gods and Goddesses of the:
temples he worshipped in; and (8) miscellaneous works
in Sanskrit and Tamil.
<p lang="sa">His genius was much more philosophic and religious.
than literary or scientific; for example, his ideas of the
Geography of the Earth must be treated as legendary or
explained away esoterically; but his logic in religious and
philosophic discussion has been found to be terribly
embarrassing to his antagonists. His mastery of the
Sanskrit language and the fluency of his diction have
justified the epithet of faar which he sometimes uses
to describe himself. On the whole he was one of the
most outstanding figures of his age in Southern India,
worshipped as an incarnation by his intimate admirers and
disciples, revered for his purity, honoured for his vast
learning, and whole-heartedly hated by the vested
religious interests he overthrew.
</page>