2023-03-02 16:06:58 by ramamurthys
This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.
b) based on contradiction of cause-and-effect (such as vib-
hāvanā and atiśayokti),
c) based on mixiv
A Handbook of Classical Sanskrit Rhetoric
b) based on contradiction of causeed contradiction (such as asangati,
vișama, vicitra and vyāghāṭa),
d) based on reciprocal contradiction due to mutual rela-and-effect
tion,
e) based on mutual contradiction (such asvib
hāvanā and atiśayokti),
c) based on mixed contradiction (such as asangati,
vișama, vicitra and vyāghāṭa),
d) based on reciprocal contradiction due to mutual rela-
tion,
e) based on mutual contradiction (such asanyonya);
-
5. figures based on the artistic device of logical relationship -
-
a) based on pure logic (such as parisamṃkhyā and vikalpa),
b) based on artistic logic (such as samuccaya and samadhi),
ādhi),
c) based on common-sense logic (such as atadguṇa,
pratyanika, pratīka, mpratīka, mīlita and tadguṇa);
6. figures of sense based on artistic refinement of extra-ordi-
nary or suggestive meaning -
-
a) based purely on suggestion (such as vyājokti, vakrokti
and svabhāvokti),
b)
b) based on extra-ordinary but clear sense (such as
bhāvika),
c) based on the merit of suggestive meaning (such as
udātta);
7. figures based on meaning expressing psychological reactions
through different kinds of sentiments and feelings like love,
pathos, valour, joy, hatred etc. (such as rasavat, preyas, urjasvi,
samāhita, bhāvodaya, bhāvasandhi, bhāva-śavalatā);
8. mixed figures based on sound and sense dependently or
independently (ie samṃkara and samṃsṛṣṭi)
--
a) figures of sound mixed together,
b) figures of sense mixed together,
c) figures of sound and sense mixed together.
But Rudratṭa, in his Kāvyālamṃkāra, classifies the figures of sense
in his own novel method. He analyses them in the following four
broad groups:
1. figures based on objective relation (sahokti, samuccaya,
jāti, yathāsamṃkhya, anumāna, bhāva, paryāya, viṣama, any-
Original from
Digitized by Google
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN
hāvanā and atiśayokti),
c) based on mix
A Handbook of Classical Sanskrit Rhetoric
b) based on contradiction of cause
vișama, vicitra and vyāghāṭa),
d) based on reciprocal contradiction due to mutual rela-
tion,
e) based on mutual contradiction (such as
hāvanā and atiśayokti),
c) based on mixed contradiction (such as asangati,
vișama, vicitra and vyāghāṭa),
d) based on reciprocal contradiction due to mutual rela-
tion,
e) based on mutual contradiction (such as
-
5. figures based on the artistic device of logical relationship -
a) based on pure logic (such as parisa
b) based on artistic logic (such as samuccaya and sam
c) based on common-sense logic (such as atadguṇa,
pratyan
6. figures of sense based on artistic refinement of extra-ordi-
nary or suggestive meaning -
a) based purely on suggestion (such as vyājokti, vakrokti
and svabhāvokti),
b)
b) based on extra-ordinary but clear sense (such as
bhāvika),
c) based on the merit of suggestive meaning (such as
udātta);
7. figures based on meaning expressing psychological reactions
through different kinds of sentiments and feelings like love,
pathos, valour, joy, hatred etc. (such as rasavat, preyas, urjasvi,
samāhita, bhāvodaya, bhāvasandhi, bhāva-śavalatā);
8. mixed figures based on sound and sense dependently or
independently (ie sa
a) figures of sound mixed together,
b) figures of sense mixed together,
c) figures of sound and sense mixed together.
But Rudra
in his own novel method. He analyses them in the following four
broad groups:
1. figures based on objective relation (sahokti, samuccaya,
jāti, yathāsa
Original from
Digitized by Google
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN