This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.

(ii) Combination of the figures of sense,
(iii) Combination of both
 
Samsrstihṃkara is a commixture of two or more figures having a rela-
tion of principal and subordinate status. Here we find one figure
co-existing with another while giving itself a secondary position.
But in such case, one alaṃkāra is not getting prominence over the
other but both of them become mutually acceptable. According to
Mammaṭa another variety of
Samkara: Conjunction of figures
 
(ii) Combination of the figures of sense
ṃkara occures where several
alaṃkāras co-exist in one verse or passage but they are not inter-
dependent and
,
(iii) Combination of both
 
Samkara is a commixture of t
moreover, one of them may be preferably
ackno
wo or more figures having a rela-
tion of principal and subordinate status
ledged but none can be accepted with certainty at the cost
of the other
. Here we find one figure
co-existing with another while giving itself a secondary position.
But in such case, one alamkāra is not getting prominence over the
other but both of them become mutually acceptable. According to
Mammaţa another variety of Samkara occures where several
alamkāras co-exist in one verse or passage but they are not inter-
dependent and, moreover, one of them may be preferably
acknowledged but none can be accepted with certainty at the cost
of the other.
The mutual relation of figures is here compared to

the mixture of milk-and-water (kṣiīra-niīra).
 

 
Older rhetoricians do not approve separate entity of these two
but recognise them as a single alam

but recognise them as a single alaṃ
kāra. Šobhākara does not admit

either Samsrstṃsṛṣṭi or Samkara as a separate figure and argues that in
ṃkara as a separate figure and argues that in
many places figures of sound and sense both exist together. In case

of figures like Rasavat, other figures are sure to occur since in all

sorts of poetic expression there must be some human sentiment or

feeling. Therefore, Sobhākara maintains that no alamkāra can exist

singularly and some figures (like Anuprāsa and Yamaka, Rūpaka

and Ślesa) are found unitedly. But Vivanātha rejects such a view

and tries to establish that conjuction or commixture of figures pro-

duces a special kind of poetic charm in many cases, which cannot

be produced by any single figure.
 

 
eg 1. Conjuction of Utprekṣā and Upamā :
 

limpatīva tamo'nʼṅgāni / varṣatīvāñjanamtaṃ nabhaḥ.

asat-puruşa ṣa- seveva / dṛṣtir viphalatām gatā.
 
177
 

लिम्पतीव तमोऽङ्गानि / वर्षतीवाञ्जतं नभः ।

असत्पुरुषसेवेव / दृष्टिर्विफलतां गता ॥

Darkness is coating the limbs, as if,

The sky is downpouring collyrium, as if,

Like servitude unto the undignified master

Eye-sight comes in vain for the on-looker.
 
Google
 
Digitized by
 
Original from
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN