2023-04-01 06:00:21 by ramamurthys
This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.
fication of one quality. To be more clear, the excellence of a thing is
implicitly stated here by comparing it to a valued object, yet mention-
ing some extra-ordinary difference, and the special difference men-
tioned in such expressions means absence of only one quality in one
of the things. But Ruyyaka considers it as just the opposite of
Vibhāvanā and the later scholars except Bhoja have followed the
same line. According to them, Vi
effect even though there is a cause for it.
Logically cause is the immediate antecedent of the effect, and,
therefore, where there is a cause, there must be an effect following
the cause. But in the poet's world, this rule may not apply, and, in
spite of a cause the effect may not appear because there must have
been some extra-ordinary reason for which normal appearance of
the effect is hindered. This is, in brief, the basic idea of Vi
But Bhoja's definition is different from the previous one. Vi
according to him, is a statement of excellence with excess or
paucity. Vāmana's definition is quite different from those of his
predecc
predecessors and followers. Ruyyaka and Jagannātha observed that
Vāmana's Vi
Vi
(i) when the cause is explicitly stated,
(ii) when the cause is not explicitly stated and
(iii) when the cause seems impossible to be conceived.
But Da
(i) ineffectiveness of attribute (guṇa-vaikalya),
(ii)
(iii)
(
eg 1.
159
ineffectiveness of genus or distinguishing properties
(jāti-vaikalya),
(iii) ineffectiveness of action (kriyā-vaikalya) and
(iv) ineffectiveness of specific objects (dravya-vaikalya).
eg 1. dyūta
द्यूतं हि नाम पुरुषस्य असिंहासनं राज्यम्
The game of dice, to a gambler, is really a kingdom
without the throne.
Digitized by
Original from
UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN