This page has been fully proofread once and needs a second look.

been defined by Jayadeva, Appayya and Jagannātha, but there is a
major difference in them.
 
The reflection may happen in various ways:
(a) merits of one reflected as defects in other,
(b) merits reflected as defects,
(c) defects reflected as defects
(d) defects reflected as merits
 
But Mammaṭa observes that this figure is only a variety of
Kāvyalinga (Poetical Cause)
 
eg 1. tadbhāgyaṃ dhanasyaiva / yannāśrayati sajjanam.
तद्भाग्यं धनस्यैव / यन्नाश्रयति सज्जनम् ।

It's indeed misfortune for riches
That it resorts not to the virtuous always.
 
In olden days, it was a traditional conception that virtues and
wealth are two poles apart and therefore, the virtuous were
believed to be devoid of riches and on the contrary, the rich were
devoid of virtues. So the poet here asserts that wealth and riches
though highly valued by all are condemned because of their associ-
ation with low-garded people.
 
Definitions
 
उल्लासोऽन्यमहिम्ना चेद्दोषो ह्यन्यत्र वर्ण्यते । च. ५.६९

एकस्य गुणदोषाभ्यामुल्लासोऽन्यस्य तौ यदि । कु. ६६.१३३

अन्यदीयगुणदोषप्रयुक्तमन्यस्य गुणदोषयोराधानमुल्लासः । र. २
 
<headword>उल्लेख</headword>
 
उल्लेखः Ullekhaḥ : Allusion :
 
The word ullekha (ut lekha) literally means mention, reference, allusion,
report, statement etc. When one important object is very fancifully
accepted in many ways or when any particular object or person
being significant by its or his multidimensional features or qualities
is described by others according to their impressions about the
object or the person, it is known as Ullekha or Allusion.
 
Here Viśvanātha refers to the views of some critics who, accord-
ing to him, think that this figure always remains associated with