2025-12-29 10:07:11 by akprasad
This page does not need to be proofread.
<p lang="en">iii</p>
<p lang="sa">colophons, Mm. Ganapati Sastri comes to the conclusion
that all these dramas are to be ascribed to Bhāsa principally
on the following important grounds :-(1) All these dramas
begin with the stage direction नान्द्यन्ते ततः प्रविशति etc., where-
as in the classical dramas we are accustomed to have the
Nandi first and then the stage direction etc. This
technical peculiarity of the Bhāsa plays seems to be alluded
to in the famous stanza of the Harṣacarita
<p lang="sa">सूत्रधार कृतारम्भैर्नाटिकैर्वहुभूमिकैः ।
<p lang="sa">सपताकयैशी लेभे भासो देवकुलैरिव ॥
<p lang="sa">where Bāņa tells us that the dramas of Bhāsa begin with
the appearance of the Sutradhara and are rich in persons
and episodes. (2) The prologue is called Sthāpanā every-
where in place of Prastāvanā. (3) Unlike the classical
dramas the title of the work and the name of the author are
not mentioned in the Sthāpanās of these plays, which fact
argues that the plays belong to pre-classical times when
details such as these were possibly left to the preliminaries.
(4) The Bharatavākya ends everywhere with the prayer
"May our mighty King rule the whole earth. " (5) The
dramas further present a structural similarity, and the
opening verses of many of the plays string together the
principal characters by what is technically called the
Mudrālankāra. (6) One of the plays is mentioned by Rāja-
Sekhara with the name of the author; it, therefore, stands
to reason that the rest of the group which show numerous
to reason that the rest of the group which show numerous
affinities with it as regards style, stage-technique, ideas and
vocabulary should be ascribed to the same poet-the poet of
the Svapnavāsavadatta. (7) Many rhetoricians bring in
their works citations from different works of Bhāsa e.g.
Vāmana gives us citations from the Sv. Pry. and Căr;
Bhāmaha seems to criticise his Pry. and actually quotes
the very words from the Pry.; Dandin cites that famous
</page>