2025-04-20 14:31:59 by ambuda-bot
This page has not been fully proofread.
THE CRITICAL APPARATUS
The mss utilised for this edition are the following :-
DEVANAGARI
'Anandāśrama mss collection, Poona No 4459
ᎠᏎ
D₂ ==
=
No 4423
"
"
"
"
D3
=
"
No 7051
"
"
"
D 5
= A manuscript from Mangalvedhã deposited at the
Bhandarkar Institute, Poona.
D = A manuscript from Kolhapur obtained through
the courtesy of Pandit Khuperkaraśāstri, dated
Saka 1789.
D₁
=
Mg
=
GRANTHA
Adyar manuscript Library No. XXIV M 25
Government Oriental manuscripts library, Madras
No. D. 11923.
MALAYALAM
Bm Oriental Institute Library, Baroda, No. 6905 (b)
TELUGU
Mt Printed edition, Madras, dated 25 Feb. 1865.
Detailed account of the manuscripts
D1
Paper ms Size 8" x 4". Folios. 80. The numbering
of stanzas is irregular, No 68, coming in its own place and
again after 69, is numbered twice; and No 69 is again
repeated. The hand-writing is clear and legible, but is not
uniform; in folio 8, for example, the letters are so bold
that instead of an average of ten lines to a page and thirty-
two letters to a line we have only eight lines to a page and
twenty-six letters to a line; while on some folios the average
of lines dwindles to only seven and of letters to twenty
only. However, as the style of writing shows the same
The mss utilised for this edition are the following :-
DEVANAGARI
'Anandāśrama mss collection, Poona No 4459
ᎠᏎ
D₂ ==
=
No 4423
"
"
"
"
D3
=
"
No 7051
"
"
"
D 5
= A manuscript from Mangalvedhã deposited at the
Bhandarkar Institute, Poona.
D = A manuscript from Kolhapur obtained through
the courtesy of Pandit Khuperkaraśāstri, dated
Saka 1789.
D₁
=
Mg
=
GRANTHA
Adyar manuscript Library No. XXIV M 25
Government Oriental manuscripts library, Madras
No. D. 11923.
MALAYALAM
Bm Oriental Institute Library, Baroda, No. 6905 (b)
TELUGU
Mt Printed edition, Madras, dated 25 Feb. 1865.
Detailed account of the manuscripts
D1
Paper ms Size 8" x 4". Folios. 80. The numbering
of stanzas is irregular, No 68, coming in its own place and
again after 69, is numbered twice; and No 69 is again
repeated. The hand-writing is clear and legible, but is not
uniform; in folio 8, for example, the letters are so bold
that instead of an average of ten lines to a page and thirty-
two letters to a line we have only eight lines to a page and
twenty-six letters to a line; while on some folios the average
of lines dwindles to only seven and of letters to twenty
only. However, as the style of writing shows the same