Since you are not logged in, some functions (such as the OCR button) have been disabled. To use all website features, please create an account. Handbook of Classical Sanskrit Rhetoric / 86 Image 86 of 262 (Page 30) History ← → Proofed once Layout Image right, text left Image above, text below Markup Mark as error Mark as fix Mark as unclear Mark as footnote number Tools : (colon) → ः (visarga) S → ऽ (avagraha) Transliterator From: Harvard-Kyoto ("aGka" → अङ्क) ITRANS ("a~Nka" → अङ्क) OPTITRANS ("anka" → अङ्क) To: Devanagari IAST Transliterate selected text Characters Click a character to copy it. Ā ā Á á Â â À à Ī ī Í í Î î Ì ì Ū ū Ú ú Û û Ù ù Ṛ ṛ Ṝ ṝ Ḷ ḷ Ḹ ḹ Ē ē É é Ê ê È è Ō ō Ó ó Ô ô Ò ò Ḥ ḥ Ṁ ṁ Ṃ ṃ Ṅ ṅ Ñ ñ Ṇ ṇ Ṭ ṭ Ḍ ḍ Ś ś Ṣ ṣ Ç ç । ॥ ऽ ॰ ꣲ ꣳ Help A+ A- (i) inter-dependence (ānugatya), (ii) cause-and-effect (kārya kāraṇa), (iii) coherence (sāmarthya), (iv) invariable concomittance (vyāpya-vyāpaka), (v) general-and-particular (sāmānya-viśeṣa). Here the process of corroboration happens thus: (a) one general idea supported by a particular, (b) one particular idea supported by a general, (c) an effect supported by a cause, (d) a cause supported by an effect, The supporting statement is normally placed after the proposi- tion to be supported, but this order may also be reversed. The fourfold division of this figure mentioned above may be based on resemblance and non-resemblance, which again may be paronomastic or non-paronomastic. So Arthāntaranyāsa can be applied in eight varieties. The figure is different from Drṣṭānta (Exemplification) and Partivastūpamā. In Arthāntaranyāsa, the two statements stand in relation to general-and-particular proposition, but in case of Dṛṣṭānta and Prativastūpamā it is not so. In Dṛṣṭānta a general proposition is supported by another such proposition or a particu- lar is strengthend by another particular one, and there is a relation of coherence between the two. In Partivastūpamā, there is a rela- tion of comparison between the two, one being the standard of com- parison (upamāna) and the other object of comparison (upameya). The last two varieties of Arthāntaranyāsa (based on the relation of cause-and-effect) as supported by Ruyyaka and Viśvanātha, prac- tically belong to the domain of Kāvyalinga. The corroboration as represented here in the present figure, according to most of the rhetoricians, is based on the relation of universal-and- general (sāmānya-viśeṣa-bhava). Arthāntaranyāsa is one of the popular figures of speech and this type of rhetoric expression is found to be very common with the Sanskrit poets. 🔍+ 🔍° 🔍- ⟲ ⟳ Edit summary (optional) Status Needs more work Proofed once Proofed twice Not relevant Only registered users can save changes. Create an account or sign in to save your changes.